PSYCHOLOGICAL ROULETTE

The following passage is taken from:
"New scientific theory"
By Theo D'Alost.

"EVERYTHING IN LIFE IS JUST A GAME"

Among courrent opinions about the game, the following one is the prevalent: "Everything in life is just a game". This is the truth.
Our life is just a game starting from the birth and ending with the last blow: the blow of death.

The fisrt blow, our entrance in the world, or better the conception of the Being. One will be born having great gifts by Nature and Luck, another one will be born rickety and miserable.

Here is the total abstraction of the will and of the possible providence. This first blow runs by hazard, if we abstract the righter and higher idea of Providence.

Then the destiny will start its work. Roulette starts turning. Anyone has got his free will, which inspires being good or bad, being happy or sad. The school behaviour, the choice of company through the wedding, the way in which we grow our children, the beginning of a career are some of our important blows, and the last one: the death.

The honest man, prudent, wise and virtuous too, will exit his life having a satisfied knowledge. The one who acted in the wrong way will be full of regret and upsettings.

This is the history of the game, but everyone must use his own special effects.

If men could use an instrument like the roulette , through which they could find the right behaviour, they would be able to escape dangers and deceptions filling up their life.

Roulette is a wonderful instrument. We consider it as a real school of phylosophy. It's like a compass to the sailor. We need to know causes and effects if we want to overwork it well. The compass shows us North and South, the roulette shows us the infinitive's direction.If we knew this machine, could we continue considering the unknow? No.

We hope that thanks to this website demonstrations, there will be no more doubts in our reader's thought. Where will the unknow be? When we face the roulette and the wheel starts turning, what does it happen? We do not know. It will come out maybe a red or a black number.

But when the first boule appears we just exit the Unknow. The game takes place, it generates a drawing, some figures, great movement, great lines producing important results which are all made by all these alements. As in our lives, there are small causes generating big effects. We know them and we use them to realise our wishes. As it happens in our lives, we use observations we can realise. If we analyse every day accidents and events, we will recognise an indication of the following events. Everything links with each other.

Roulette is a machine leading us and teaching us how to preview. What we see behind and around us, should lead us on the right way. Great life's events, like big roulette discards will not overtake us. They're their same excuse, and if we could analyse past events of life as we could study those ones of the roulette, we will have the highest degree of comfort and prosperity we can have from our life.

Unfortunately experience is quite useless to men, they do not suffuciently look behind them. In Roulette there are constant teachings. The one who have understood them will be able to see the truth in a short time and everywhere, he will be able to avoid disappointments generating ignorance and lack of precision.

But under a scientific point of view, what do we see? We just establish that laws in a game are the same than laws in Nature. They produce the same fluctuations any element suffers. Seasons, days, stars, physics have their own discards where they have their own averages. They normally harmonised and stabilised each others.

What we call "phenomenon" in a game, under a sense we arbitrarily give to something unexpected, is the same thing we find in Nature. The apparition of an unknow star, an hurricane destroying a country, an earthquake swallowing a city… or a series of 25 - 30 reds numbers, are all phenomenons.
Unexpected? No. Even if we do not have already established them, we know they can happen.
All wise men, in every branch of knowledge, try to prewiev, to study and to know them, in order to attenuate their effects and to turn them into somekind of humanity's benefit.
Is that the same, talking about game? NO!

WHAT DOES THE PLAYER WANT?
He wants to guess what is going to come out, to subdue the unknow, playing against something it is possible it happened. That's the dream of a crazy and sick man. He is tortured by the same idea: to be winner. This strong desire controls him. He has got no patience to analyse the game, whose knowledge requires an hard and long work. He just wants to play and win. He neglects everything: his luck and the luck of anyone else if he just would like to take possession of it, the estimation he has and often his same life.

We must consider many suicides, not only caused by the Roulette, but by the whole world of hazard games, races, stock-exchange, industrial sepculating, and due only to the luck's pernicious cupidity, which the more foundamental wisdom teaches us to ask only to the hard work and to the remuneration we're expecting from it. With a bit of impartiality, we should realise that suicides around game-rooms could have taken place even somewhere else in other conditions. If only we could analyse man's bottom mentality.

The man pushed in his last entrechements has already been damaged by his previous speculation. He visits Casinos to risk everything he can on a single blow. He thinks he can make up the money he has lost, just by chance; and that's Jean-Jacques theory:

" I do understand the game just in one case: when we must face the terrible dilemma. Death of life? When only a good blow can save you"

We've just started this chapter saying that, if the man had in service a machine like the roulette, and it could lead him, he would escape many disappointments. But does he have it really, doesn't he? Under another point of view, this is the great little history, his own experience and the own of his company are not in debate, they're not subjects of remarks or studies and judgements which can allow him to choose the right way of life he should follow. Can't we examine, compare or study everything which has already happened , and try to build up some deductions as we do with the roulette, can we?

No. Generally experience is useless. If we strongly desire something, we just see it in front of us, we just want to realise our desire, maybe following somekind of project having no basis. And for ¾ of our time we just fall and what we can run into are just bad disappointments.

Roulette is the perfect instrument, whose detailed study allows us to adfirm that it is the only instrument through which we can have some means to speculate whitout any hazard.
We cannnot say the same thing for any other field.
There are risks everywhere and in everything, unexpected events can destroy our previews. Roulette makes you arbiter of this occurrence.
We need to abstract now, all human fallings; we need to operate a complete blank of all player's ideas, we need to go straight ahead in the right direction, we need to be wise, or to find wisdom only through our will, in order to recongnize truth and mistake.

Second common opinion: "Everyrhing is possible in a game, we can run into the most incredible events that can destroy any combination". This can happen only to a player but not in reality.

The point of view under which the palyer considers the game, will persuade him to consider as a phenomenon, the apparition of a long series of black numbers (20 or more), the lack of a dozen or of a column for more than 30/40 blows, or the absence of a munbers in 3-400 rotations, or the apparition of the figure that will hit him, etc etc…
This is why everything is possible in a game.

This can happen only because the palyer palys everything he has against these discards, he can recognize them only when he looses a great figure of money. Here is the total lack of consideration, the absurdity, the contradiction of reasoning. If everything is possible why does he need to play against these phenomenons he thinks as impossibles, while, otherwise, he plays much more against their own apparition, and he admits the can happen? That's the height of illogicality.

The truth is that, if those phenomenons happened in a perfect normal order that we know, nd they are mathematical figures, game discards finding their own equilibrium, this is just the original law of game, as we said before.

All players have seen the same number coming out 7/8 or more times, in 10/12 blows and another one, instead, coming out 3, 4 or 5 times. In the first case the number has got an advantage of 8X37=296, in the second case 5X37=185. The advantage exactly coincides with the number of discards produced on all other numbers. Since these discards are not divided among all numbers, they will happen only on a single number which will be considered as representative of the penomenon.

This is only one of the discard's factor. It is about the movement of the game which we can resume as "discard" and "equilibrium".

The player reasons, we could say he reasons falsely, only when he starts loosing or winning. In this way all his conceptions are falses, absurds without any logic.
With the total lack of normal sense he can only follow his impulses pushing him to this "ideal" whose conclusion is unavoidably the catastrophe.

This is why he does not inspire too much trust and simpathy. And this is why he does not care too much about his diappointments and about his final fall.

It's just justice because he looses all elements about his duties towards other people, and all his honesty's feelings. And even if he's lucky on the green baize, he would not spend 100 pennies to save a human life.