|
THE
ROULETTE THEORY
I'm
pleased to start some kind of mathematical discussion
on this survey. To me this is one of the most important
surveys in this website, and it will propose everytime
the opinion of the most authoritative roulette experts
and university professors of statistic and calculus
of probabilities.
Therefore,
they will happen by turn carpet's experts coniderations
(obviously they will be all mathematicians, access denied
to those who believes in the wins at equal mass) and
famous academicians, in order to realise a section of
practital- theoretical interest like never before.
Let's ask ourselves the following
question:
Which
is the possibility that, in the following 37 numbers,
we will get:
1^:
3; 21; 18; 3; 1; 21; 0; 34; 27; 12; 9;
(other
numbers defined a priori)
23; 12; 0; 0; 24;
2^:
1; 2; 3; 4; 5;
(growing order umbers)
.
34; 35; 36; 0;
3^:
21; 21; 21; 21; 21;
(always
21)
21; 21; 21;
The
propability is exactly the same. We mean (1/37) raised
to 37^ power.
But the 1st sequence does not make a great fuss, while
other two are quite shocking.
Let's go on. The more probable event is the one in which
between 37 numbers we will get:
1^:
the 1st sequence?;
2^:
any number but repeated 37 times?;
3^:
37 different numbers in any kind of order?;
It's
obviuos tha the less probable event is the 1st, because
we've just said that its probability is 1/37 raised
to 37^ power.
The
probability of the 2nd event is: (1/37) raised to 37^
power, the result multiplied by 37.This is why there
are 37 numbers, and each one it's repeated 37 times.
That's a possible case.
Even
more probable is the 3rd event, which has been considered
impossible (I do not know why) by the authors of the
"Law of the third". (Many people, to me, did
not right understand this law; I've quite read that,
if between 37 numbers we do not have the distribution
that the "Law of the third" previews, the
wheel must be considered as fixed! What a great igonrance!!).
If
we wanted to quantify it, we should just raise (37 x
36 x 35 x 34
x 3 x 2) / 37 to
the 37^ power.
Conclusion
Numbers
are casuals (It's like to discover something that the
whole world already knows, but many people still ignore).
They work as casual numbers, placing themselves following
statistic laws (Sometimes wrongly understood).
Events
I've just proposed, even if they're possible, are too
extraordinaries (rares) an maybe we'll NEVER
run into them.
Instead, we will run into more common events.

|