|
RED AND BLACK
One
of the most common opinion about 30-40 is that the composition
of the pack can affect the probability about the exit
of red and black. Obviously it is just myth, but in
spite of that, this thought is so diffused even between
game "experts". The great mathematician E.Thorp
(The fundamental theorem of card-counting
with application to Trente et Quarante" International
journal of game theory, 1973) demonstrated
that these two chances are both probable in the same
way. Prof. Fabrizio Mauro demostrated it too, in a way
that we can now adfirm, without any denial, that no
pack composition can bring any mathematical advantage
to one of these two chances. Following our phylosophy
we won't clear, now, the complex mathematical demonstration,
which maybe, not everyone will be able to understand,
but we'are going to bring a simple example that will
clear any doubt.
Let's
analyse an "extreme" case concerning a pack
which is impossible to lose whit.
In
this pack we have a 10 and a 3. The 3
can move in 8 different positions, having the same probability.
Let's see these positions and scores and results of
the blow we are considering:

Note:
N (noir) = Black // R (rouge)
= Red
Now we have to analyse what happens in EVERY SINGLE
CASE:.
1st case: B winning
2nd case: B winning
3rd case: B winning
4th case: B winning
5th case: R winning
6th case: R winning
7th case: R winning
8th case: R winning
Obviously
perfect equality: both chances in this case, as in any
other case, have got the same probability. Technically
we talk about symmetry (S).
This
demonstrates that any kind of counter based on Red and
Black game, has got no value.

|